|
Many CEOs (and even former CEO’s) get free use of corporate aircraft for personal travel. This outsized perk costs shareholders millions of dollars each year. This is based on the calculation of CEO company jet travel in 2005. Now with the increase in fuel costs, this perk is even more outrageous.
By Michael Brush Airfares are soaring. Airlines are sinking. But the skies are as friendly as ever for an elite class of corporate chief executives. These frequent-flying bigwigs can ignore ticket prices because each year they get millions of dollars worth of personal trips on company jets. Ultimately, shareholders foot the bill. Surprisingly, the CEOs receive this perk -- which often extends to friends and family -- even though they already take home millions of dollars a year in salaries and bonuses. As we've discovered in other articles we've published recently about excessive CEO compensation, investors who brush off this corporate largesse are making a big mistake. The stocks of these companies, on average, lag the rest of the market, according to a recent study. Heres a look at some of the most egregious executive frequent-flier plans. AT&T paid Chairman and Chief Executive David Dorman total salary and bonus of $10.3 million from 2002 to 2004. He also got restricted stock, long-term incentive awards and other compensation valued at $18.2 million, and 2.3 million stock options. So you might think he had enough money to pay for his own personal air travel. Instead, as part of that pay package shareholders footed a bill for $922,000 for Dorman’s private use of AT&T’s jet during those three years, according to company reports. But the true cost of that air travel was probably as much as $2 million. Because of shortcomings in the way companies report the costs of corporate jets, they typically only reveal one-half to a third of the real price tag. AT&T’s subsidy for personal use of the corporate jet, like those for all the highfliers we mention here, is way above average. The median cost for private trips last year by CEOs at Fortune 500 companies was $81,324, says Equilar, a San Mateo, Cailf.-company that tracks executive compensation. SBC Communications will give Chairman and Chief Executive Edward Whitacre Jr. access to the company jet for the rest of his life after retirement, along with office space, a support staff, access to a company car and health benefits. In fairness to Whitacre, he is a relatively light user of the company aircraft. Last year, he took only $32,312 worth of personal flights, well below the median for Fortune 500 companies. It's not like Whitacre can't afford to pay his own way. SBC paid him $22.3 million in salary and bonus over the past three calendar years and received restricted stock, long-term incentive payouts and other pay valued at $21.5 million. He also received 3.2 million stock options. These kinds of benefits are important to retain the value that Mr. Whitacre brings to the company and shareholders, and to make sure he is available to the company after he retires, the spokeswoman says. Whitacre will work as a consultant for the company for at least three years in retirement. She says SBC wants Whitacre to use the corporate jet for private flights for security reasons, as well. These kinds of benefits are important to retain the value that Mr. Whitacre brings to the company and shareholders, and to make sure he is available to the company after he retires, the spokeswoman says. Whitacre will work as a consultant for the company for at least three years in retirement. She says SBC wants Whitacre to use the corporate jet for private flights for security reasons, as well. As much as a salary
Some executives get as much in free airfare for personal travel as they do in salary and bonus. Goody's Family Clothing Chairman and Chief Executive Robert Goodfriend and Leucadia National President Joseph Steinberg each earned an average of about $1.2 million a year from 2002 to 2004. During those three years, Steinberg ran up an airfare bill worth $1.9 million, while Goodfriends travel cost $1.2 million, according to company reports. But the true cost of that air travel was probably more than $4 million for Steinberg and $2 million for Goodfriend. To find most of these examples, I took the 100 S&P 1,500 companies with the biggest perk packages for execs. Then I looked at proxy statements for each company to see how much the top execs were allowed to use corporate jets for private travel. Proxy statements, available at the Securities and Exchange Commission Web site, are documents companies file each spring ahead of annual meetings, containing details of executive pay. These flight subsidies, like other CEO perks and pay, appall shareholder advocates. There just isn’t a credible business rational for giving this perk to executives, says Brandon Reese, a research analyst the AFL-CIO Office of Investment. Use of the corporate jet for personal travel is the emblem of the imperial CEO. We believe it is a waste of corporate assets. Companies are pushing the limits of shareholder patience, says Patrick McGurn, executive vice president of Institutional Shareholder Services, which evaluates corporate governance for professional investors. They are blurring the line between corporate and personal property, and that is where you always start to run into trouble. Keeping the chief safe
The companies say the practice is justified. Spokesmen for St. Paul Travelers and AT&T say their boards require their CEOs to use the company jet for private trips for security reasons. There is no question that there is a legitimate security argument, says National Business Aviation Association spokesman Dan Hubbard. These aircraft do not have a record of being hijacked. The passengers don’t get roughed up by other surly passengers. Their bags, which often contain sensitive information, don’t get snooped through, stolen or lost. But New York University Stern School of Business professor David Yermack, who follows private use of corporate jets closely, says safety records don’t support the security rationale. While the total accident rate per flight hour is comparable for corporate and commercial flights, corporate aviation has a much higher fatal accident rate, he wrote in a recent paper on the topic, called Corporate Jets, CEO Perquisites, and Inferior Shareholder Returns. St. Paul Travelers and AT&T also say they report a lot of business travel as personal." AT&T CEO Dorman is frequently conducting legitimate business -- speaking, doing media interviews or attending other functions that advance our business goals -- on trips that we are classifying as personal, says an AT&T spokesman. NBAAs Hubbard says many companies use corporate jets because it minimizes an executive's time away from the office. He says some companies limit private use to times when the corporate jet is not otherwise in use. AT&T’s Dorman gets a lot of work done" during his corporate-jet flights, which is a benefit to shareholders, says an AT&T spokesman. These planes are essentially flying offices. AT&T also maintains its incremental costs seem higher because it reports actual maintenance costs instead of estimates, and because Dorman uses older planes, which are out of warranty, so they have higher per-trip maintenance expenses. Gone, but not forgotten
None of these arguments seem to apply to another practice that corporate governance advocates find particularly galling -- giving retired CEOs free access to the corporate jet for personal travel, often for life. General Dynamics for example, has promised CEO Nicholas Chabraja 500 hours worth of flight time on the corporate jet in his first 10 years of retirement. Chabraja earned $10.9 million in salary and bonus from 2002 to 2004 and $10.7 million in restricted stock and other pay, plus 826,150 stock options. Last year, General Dynamics paid $270,000 in incremental costs for his private use of the corporate jet. General Dynamics declined comment, other than to refer us to the company's proxy statement. 'Yes men' in the board room
Reese says private use of the corporate jet by CEOs is an investor red flag because it suggests a board is too cozy with top executives. So the board is less likely to do its job of looking out for shareholder interests. Excessive perks indicate that the board cannot say no to the CEO, and there is fundamental power imbalance in the boardroom, says Reese. NYUs Yermack found that the shares of companies reporting private use of the corporate jet by CEOs lagged comparable companies by four percentage points a year over a 10-year period ending in 2002. He also found that these companies, as a group, were more likely to miss earnings estimates and take extraordinary accounting write-offs. The hidden costs
A big problem for investors is that SEC rules on reporting perks can make it hard to know if a company lets the CEO use the corporate jet for private travel. Companies dont have to report perks -- including private use of the corporate jet -- if those perks are worth less than $50,000 or 10% of an executives salary and bonus. And companies reporting perks dont have to reveal private use of the corporate jet unless the incremental cost exceeds 25% of the overall perk package. Its also hard to know how much the private use of the jet really costs. By SEC rules, companies only have to report the incremental cost of the jet time, or the costs of things like fuel, crew hotel and meals, onboard catering, landing fees, and trip-related maintenance and hanger fees. By leaving out fixed costs -- like the price of the aircraft, crew salaries and insurance -- investors are missing a big piece of the picture. For example, the incremental cost of running a Gulfstream 350, a jet commonly used by corporate execs, is $2,775 per hour, according to David Wyndham at Conklin & de Decker Aviation Information, an aviation research and consulting firm based in Orleans, Mass. But that goes up to from $4,500 to more than $6,500 once fixed costs are thrown in, depending on accounting methods, says Conklin & de Decker.
|
